本复审决定为评述权利要求2的创造性所引用的对比文件与驳回决定所引用的对比文件相同，即，对比文件2： US －－－－， 公开日为____年__月__日。
（二）关于专利法第__条
专利法第__条规定：申请人可以对其专利申请文件进行修改，但是， 对发明和实用新型专利申请文件的修改不得超出原说明书和权利要求书记载的范围。
“审查指南”第二部分第八章____节关于修改的要求中明确指出：原说明书和权利要求书记载的范围包括原说明书和权利要求书文字记载的内容和根据原说明书和权利要求书文字记载的内容以及说明书附图能真接地，毫无嶷义地确定的内容。
“审查指南”第二部分第八章第_____节关于于对权利要求书修改的要求中明确指出：对权利要求书的修改主要包括：通过增加或变更独立权利要求的技术特征， 或者通过变更独立权利要求的主题类型或主题名称以及其相应的技术特征， 来改变该独立权利要求请求保护的范围；增加或者删除一项或多项权利要求。对于上述修改，只要经修改后的权利要求的技术方案已清楚地记载在原说明书和权利要求书中，就应该允许。

The original examination decision comments on the two of the rights requested for the qualification as an invention citing that the rejection decision is comparative of documents and takes into account their similarities, signifying that such comparision with the second document: US －－－－ , published _____ __, ____.Regarding the invention article __ :
The __rd article of the legal statute pertaining to inventions states: the applicant may modify their document of application for inventions, nevertheless, it must be clear that there are new type of invention therein so that the document as modified may not exceed the original explanatory remarks as to the scope of the rights requested within the original application.
{ The examination guide} The second section of the eighth article, item ____regarding the change in request makes mention as follows: the original explanatory remarks and rights request document explicitly state that the scope includes the contents of both the original document and the rights request document to be also in accordance with said original explanatory document and the wording of the rights request shall be linked closely in addition to any pertinent attached graphics, taking without any error in meaning the contents of the decision.
{The examination guide} The second section of the eighth article, item ____ with regard to the explicit references within the modifications of the rights request: of central importance to the changes rendered to the rights request include: through both increasing and making yet still greater demands within the rights request within the specific points, or through making more strong the central tenets describing the rights requested, the modifications certainly extend the scope of rights requested; increasing or deleting one or more items of the rights requested. With regard to the aforesaid changes, it is only wanted to change the specific itemized plan of rights requested to render it more clearly for both the original explanatory remarks as well as the rights request document, and then it should be allowed.